State of maharashtra v. mohd. yakub summary

Author: rajr

August undefined, 2024

WebMatch List-I with List-II and Select the correct answer: List I (Offence) List II (Case) a. Criminal attempt 1. State of Maharashtra v. Mohd. Yakub b. Common intention 2. Virsa Singh v. State of Punjab c. Robbery 3. Barindra Kumar … WebMar 22, 2024 · In State of Maharashtra v. Mohd. Yakub, (1980) 3 SCC 57 case, the customs department received some secret information from their sources that a jeep and truck of …

State of Maharashtra Vs. Mohd. Yakub S/O Abdul Hamid & Ors …

WebJun 24, 2024 · Accused-Respondent 1, Mohd. Yakub is sentenced to suffer one year’s rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs 2000 and, in default, to suffer six months’ further rigorous imprisonment. WebFaculty of LAW geoff manis moline

Malkiat Singh v. State of Punjab Archives - The Fact Factor

WebMay 7, 2024 · Case Summary State of Maharashtra vs. Mayer Hans George By Adya Samal - May 7, 2024 In the Supreme Court of India 1965 AIR 722, 1965 SCR (1) 123 Petitioner State of Maharashtra Respondent Mayer Hans George Date of Judgement 24 August 1964 Bench Justice K. Subbarao, Justice Rajagopala Ayyangar, Justice J.R. Mudholkar Background: WebState of Maharashtra vs Mohd. Yakub (AIR 1980 sc 1111) On receiving some secret information that silver would be transported in a Jeep and Truck from Bombay, police … WebAlso quoted with approval in Yakub Abdul Razak v State of Maharashtra through CBI, Bombay, (2013) 13 SCC 1 [LNIND 2013 SC 226] : 2013 (4) Scale 565 ... [LNIND 2002 SC 243]. 53 Mohd Usman Mohd Hussain Maniyar v State of Maharashtra, AIR 1981 SC 1062 [LNIND 1981 SC 127]: (1981) ... chris little psalm 23

IPC case law for Preliminary exam as well as Mains Judicial Services

Indian independence movement - Wikipedia

In the Commission of a crime, there are 4 stages. First, the intention or mens rea to commit the criminal act. Second, doing the preparations to … See more It must be noted that there can be no exact definition of ‘Attempt’ as it would depend on the facts and circumstances of each particular case. … See more 1. Whether in the present case, it could be inferred beyond a reasonable doubt that the respondents had attempted to export the silver in contravention of law from India? See more WebSep 22, 2024 · CONCLUSION: The court delivered judgement in the respondent’s favor. It concluded that since the appellant has already completed his application process, which shows that an attempt has already been made, that’s why the appellant will be held liable under section 420 read with section 511. Found Abhayanand Mishra case summary useful? geoff mangum bookWebApr 30, 2024 · Bench: Justice P.Sathasivam and Justice B.S. Chauhan Appellant: Yakub Abdul Razak Memon Respondent: The State of Maharashtra, through, CBI, Bombay Issue. The present appeal and the appeals related to the matter were filed under Section 19 of the TADA Act, by the appellant and the other accused against the various judgments given by … chris little river sc

"WebJun 24, 2024 · State of Punjab [(1969) 2 SCR 663, 667] a truck which was carrying paddy, was stopped at Samalkha 32 miles from Delhi and about 15 miles from the Delhi-Punjab … " - State of maharashtra v. mohd. yakub summary

State of maharashtra v. mohd. yakub summary

WebSep 30, 2016 · Yakub Abdul Razak Memon v. State of Maharashtra andOr 1. The case is decided in Supreme Court of India, Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 135 of 2015 Under Article … WebJun 23, 2014 · Balkrishna v. State Of Maharashtra. 1. By this appeal, the appellant takes exception to the judgment and order passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Akola, dated 1st of June, 2002 in Special Case No.6 of 1992 convicting appellant for the offences punishable under Sections 7, 13 (1) (d) read with Section 13 (2) of the Prevention …

Did you know?

WebAccused-Respondent 1, Mohd. Yakub is sentenced to suffer one year's rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs 2000 and, in default, to suffer six months' further rigorous … WebMar 9, 2024 · Case Name : State of Maharashtra Vs. Mohd. Yakub and Others Author : Shraddha Jindal Equivalent Citation: 1980 AIR 1111 1980 SCR (2)1158 1980 SCC (3) 57 …

WebOct 24, 2024 · 73) State of Maharashtra v. Mohd. Yakub 74) P. Rathinam v. Union of India- Attempt to suicide (309) 75) Maruti Shripati Dubal v. State of Maharashtra- Attempt to suicide (309) 76) Gian Kaur v. State of Punjab- Attempt to suicide (309) 77) Defamation : Subramaniam Swamy v UOI WebAccused-respondent 1, Mohd. Yakub is sentenced to suffer one year's rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 2, 000/- and, in default, to suffer six months' further rigorous imprisonment.

WebSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA vs MOHAMMED YAKUB Case Summary 1980 SCC . Shubham Garg September 22, 2024 . OM PRAKASH vs STATE OF PUNJAB Case Summary 1962 SC … WebAccused-respondent 1, Mohd. Yakub is sentenced to suffer one year's rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 2, 000/- and, in default, to suffer six months' further …

WebState Of Maharashtra vs Mohd. Yakub S/O Abdul Hamid & Ors on 4 March, 1980 Sunnawar Ali vs The State on 5 September, 2024 Ranjit Export Private Ltd. vs Collector Of Customs, Madras on 6 September, 1984 The Principal Commissioner Of ... vs Kishan Manjibhai Gadhesariya on 14 February, 2024

WebLalita Kumari v. State of UP :FIR mandatory in cognizable cases 2. Mohd. Ahmad Khan vs Shah Bano Begum :Section 125 of CrPC Secular 3. D.K. Basu v. State of Bengal :SC guidelines relating to rights of the arrested person 4. Nilabati Bahera v. State of Orissa :Compensation in case of unlawful arrest and detention 5. geoff mangum\u0027s puttingzoneWebState of Maharashtra Vs. Mohd. Yakub S/O Abdul Hamid & Ors [1980] INSC 40 (4 March 1980) SARKARIA, RANJIT SINGH SARKARIA, RANJIT SINGH REDDY, O. CHINNAPPA (J) … geoff mangum puttingWebMar 9, 2024 · Case Name : State of Maharashtra Vs. Mohd. Yakub and Others Author : Shraddha Jindal Equivalent Citation: 1980 AIR 1111 1980 SCR (2)1158 1980 SCC (3) 57 Bench: Justice R. S. SarkariaJustice Ranjit Singh preprationJustice Chinnappa Reddy Introduction: In the present case of ” state of Maharashtra vs. Mohammed Yakub and … geoff manley md phdWebJan 8, 2024 · Yakub Memon was found guilty of criminal conspiracy, for carrying out terrorist activities and murder, aiding and abetting terrorist attacks. He was also held … chris little stockport murderWebMar 4, 1980 · Yakub is sentenced to suffer one year's rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 2,000 and, in default, to suffer six months' further rigorous imprisonment. Accused … geoff manley mdWebThe Indian independence movement was a series of historic events with the ultimate aim of ending British rule in India.It lasted from 1857 to 1947. The first nationalistic revolutionary movement for Indian independence emerged from Bengal.It later took root in the newly formed Indian National Congress with prominent moderate leaders seeking the right to … geoff manley ucsfWebMuthu Naicker and Ors v. State of Tamil Nadu (1978) 4 SCC 385. Musa Khan and Ors v. State of Maharashtra (1977) 1 SCC 733. TT Antony v. State of Kerala (2001) 6 SCC 181. Ashok sagarv. State (NCT ... geoff mangum optimal putting